There are few people who have watched the disturbing footage of Renee Nicole Good’s fatal shooting without forming a strong opinion.

The 37-year-old mother was shot and killed last week in Minneapolis during an encounter with ICE agents, an incident that has since ignited fierce debate across the United States. Competing accounts have only deepened the controversy. Official statements from federal authorities allege that Good attempted to obstruct ICE agents using her vehicle, while widely shared video footage appears to show her trying to drive away as an officer opened fire.

The officer involved, identified as Jonathan Ross, was positioned in front of Good’s car when he fired three shots into the vehicle. Good was mortally wounded and later crashed. In footage that has circulated widely online, Ross can be heard uttering a profanity directed at Good immediately after the shooting — a moment that has intensified public outrage and scrutiny.

BREAKING: Alpha News has obtained cellphone footage showing perspective of federal agent at center of ICE-involved shooting in Minneapolis pic.twitter.com/p2wks0zew0

— Alpha News (@AlphaNews) January 9, 2026

The incident has become a flashpoint in an already polarized political climate. The Department of Homeland Security moved quickly to label Good a “domestic terrorist,” a characterization echoed by President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. The administration’s position centers on the claim that Good was attempting to run over ICE agents, thereby allowing Ross to argue he acted in self-defense.

Others strongly dispute that interpretation. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has publicly stated that Good was murdered and that the officer involved should be charged. Legal analysts, civil rights advocates, and members of the public have also questioned whether the use of deadly force was justified, particularly given the video evidence showing Good’s vehicle moving away at the time shots were fired.

The divisions extend even into Good’s family. Her former father-in-law, Timmy Macklin, recently told CNN that he does not blame ICE for Good’s death, describing the situation as “hard for everybody involved.”

“I’m not blaming anybody,” Macklin said when asked about Ross’ decision to shoot. He explained that his view evolved after seeing footage he initially hadn’t watched. “I’ve seen the bumper of the car hitting his legs. And so in a flash like that, it’s hard to say how you would react.”

Macklin, who confirmed he is a supporter of Donald Trump, also said he did not agree with Good’s actions on the day she was killed. Framing his comments through his religious beliefs, he added, “If we’re walking in the spirit of God, I don’t think she would have been there.”

At the same time, Macklin criticized Ross’ language after the shooting, saying the officer’s remarks reflected poorly on his character. “The things he called her — that’s definitely showing evidence that he don’t know the Lord like he should,” he said.

The issue resurfaced again during a recent interview between Trump and CBS Evening News anchor Tony Dokoupil. Dokoupil told the former president that he had spoken with Renee Good’s father, noting that he too is a Trump supporter despite being deeply hurt by how his daughter was described after her death.

Responding to questions about his administration’s use of the term “domestic terrorist,” Trump said, “I wanna say to the father that I love all of our people. They can be on the other side.” He added that, under different circumstances, Good was likely “a very solid, wonderful person,” before concluding that “her actions were pretty tough.”

As investigations and public debate continue, Renee Nicole Good’s death remains a deeply divisive case — one that sits at the intersection of law enforcement authority, use of force, political rhetoric, and grief. Whether charges will be filed against the officer involved remains unresolved, and the questions raised by the footage continue to reverberate far beyond Minneapolis.