The manhunt for Charlie Kirk’s assassin didn’t just spark outrage — it also triggered a reward race that ballooned into more than $1.1 million.

Now, one big question has everyone talking: could that money end up in the hands of the suspect’s own family?

Boosted by Trump advisor
Kirk, 31, was fatally shot while addressing students at a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University on September 10.

The FBI initially offered $100,000 for information leading to the gunman. That figure quickly skyrocketed when Trump adviser Alex Bruesewitz chipped in $25,000. Conservative activist Robby Starbuck then matched it, and then billionaire investor Bill Ackman dropped a jaw-dropping $1 million.

That pushed the total bounty to about $1.15 million.

Who gets the $1.2M reward?
The suspected gunman, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, was taken into custody in a quiet suburban neighborhood where loyalty to President Donald Trump runs deep — the same Trump who shared close ties with Charlie Kirk.

Robinson grew up in a Republican family in St. George, Utah, a small town about three hours from Utah Valley University, where Kirk was fatally shot.

What exactly drove him to get in his car, drive hours across the state, and fatally shoot Kirk remains unclear. Neighbors and former classmates remain in shock, remembering him as a smart, well-mannered young man.

Initial reports indicate that Robinson reportedly turned himself in to police on Thursday evening, and according to some sources, his father recognized him after the FBI released images of the suspected shooter. The father then confided in a friend, who in turn contacted authorities.

Bill Ackman’s take
As soon as Robinson was identified as the suspect, rumors exploded online: could his father really walk away with the $1.2 million reward for helping turn him in?

Billionaire Bill Ackman, who personally pledged $1 million toward the bounty, tackled the speculation head-on in a post on X.

“A number of people have reached out and/or posted expressing concern that Tyler Robinson’s father may collect a $1.2m reward for turning in his son, which inspires a few thoughts.”

Ackman explained why rewards can’t come with exceptions:

“First, in order for rewards to be effective in finding criminals, the rewards need to be paid even if the recipient is a crook or worse. That said, in this case, if Tyler’s father is found to have been involved or otherwise acted negligently in contributing to Charlie’s death, civil litigation or criminal prosecution will reverse any unjust compensation.”

In plain terms: if the family is innocent, they qualify. If not, they’re out.

Did his dad even make the call?
Ackman went further, addressing reports that Robinson’s relatives don’t even want the money.

“So yes, we will pay the reward if it is earned to whomever the FBI indicates provided the information that led to Tyler’s arrest. I always keep my word.”

But here’s where things get messy. According to an earlier police report, it wasn’t Robinson’s father who contacted law enforcement, it was the family friend.

The report reveals: “On the evening of September 11, 2025 a family member of Tyler Robinson reached out to a family friend, who contacted the Washington County Sheriff’s Office with information that Robinson had confessed to them or implied that he had committed the incident. This information was relayed to the Utah County Sheriff’s Office and scene investigators at UVU. This information was also conveyed to the FBI.”

With over $1.2 million on the line, the question of who actually deserves the payout is sparking heated debate. Should a parent — or even a family friend — be rewarded for turning in someone they love? Or should blood ties disqualify them from cashing in?