Math problem from 2019 divides the internet

In a world where social media thrives on polarizing debates, one would hardly expect a math problem to spark such a heated conversation. But one equation did just that.

In 2019, a seemingly simple math equation became a viral problem for social media users and “practically caused a civil war in the Popular Mechanics office.”

At its core, this wasn’t just about math; it was a cultural phenomenon, showcasing how people interpret rules differently and, sometimes, fiercely defend their perspectives.

Let’s break down the drama and explore why this problem became so controversial.

Math isn’t always fun
The problem reads:
8 ÷ 2(2 + 2)

At first glance, it seems straightforward. But the simplicity is deceptive. Depending on how you interpret the order of operations, the answer could either be 1 or 16.

The case for 16

According to the PEMDAS/BODMAS rule (Parentheses/Brackets, Exponents/Orders, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction), equations or problems should be solved in the order specified by the acronym, starting with parentheses, followed by exponents, and continuing through the remaining operations – always working from left to right.

This means that the 2 + 2 in the parenthesis should be solved first, leaving people with 8 ÷ 2 x 4. After this, the equation calls for solving the leftmost operation first, so 8 ÷ 2 must be solved first rather than 2 x 4.

This gives us 4, leading to 4 x 4, equaling 16.

2 + 2 = 4
8 ÷ 4 = 4
4 x 4 = 16
However, a significant portion of the online community disagrees with this interpretation, including some mathematicians who are well-versed in the subject.

Mike Breen of the American Mathematical Society Public Awareness Office said, “the way it’s written, it’s ambiguous.”

Working with Popular Mechanics in solving this equation, Breen adds “In math, a lot of times there are ambiguities. Mathematicians try to make rules as precise as possible. According to strict order of operations, you’d get 16, but I wouldn’t hit someone on the wrist with a ruler if they said 1.”

The case for 1

How did they get 1 as an answer?

The team followed the PEMDAS rule but interpreted it differently. While they agreed that the 2 + 2 inside the parentheses should be solved first, they argued that the resulting sum should be treated as if it were still within parentheses, essentially rewriting the equation as 8 ÷ 2(4), which gives us 1.

Weighing in on the massive problem, Rhett Allain, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Physics at Southeastern Louisiana University, says “This is the math version of, ‘What color is this dress? Blue and black or gold and white?’”

Rhett says the answer is 16.

“Of course this isn’t math. This is convention. We have conventions on how to write these things just like we have conventions on how to spell stuff. But still, there are different conventions. Some people spell it as ‘gray’ and others as ‘grey.’” He adds, “We still understand what’s going on. For me, I would write this more explicitly so that there is no confusion…That way no one will get it wrong.”

Whether you’re on team 16 or team 1, this viral phenomenon proves one thing: math has never been so confusing or more entertaining! So, which side are you on? Let us know in the comments!

Related Posts

Former Prince Andrew’s angry 11-word outburst after being arrested – insider reveals

The arrest of former senior royal Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, previously known as Prince Andrew, drew massive attention last week. Now, new details have surfaced about what the royal…

First pictures and name emerge after Mar-a-Lago gunman shot dead by Secret Service

A 21-year-old man was shot to death after entering Mar-a-Lago on Sunday, carrying a shotgun and a gasoline canister. Now, the man has been identified. An armed…

Here’s every female celebrity named in the Epstein files

The Epstein files continue to stir strong reactions. Although much of the media attention has centered on men like Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew), Donald Trump, and…

People are fuming over Kash Patel celebrating with Team USA at the Olympics

FBI Director Kash Patel celebrated with the US men’s hockey team after winning Olympic gold. Videos of his celebration in the dressing room went viral, but many…

KFC Redefines the Meaning of Always Open by Removing Restaurant Doors, Transforming Entrances into Bold Advertising Statements

🍗 When KFC Turns Architecture Into Advertising KFC’s decision to remove doors from select 24/7 locations is not a publicity stunt. It is a carefully designed visual…

The House Without Snow and the Secret It Hid-

Snow fell steadily across the neighborhood, softening every shape it touched. Cars disappeared beneath white layers. Trees bowed under the weight. Rooftops slowly vanished into winter. All…