Woman Wants To Rename Certain Body Parts Because They Are “Offensive”

professor of anatomy from Australia is pushing the world health community to rename body parts that she finds , “irrelevant and misogynistic.”
Some of the common body parts that Dr. Kristin Small argues need a new name include the Adam’s apple and the Achilles tendon, which are named after men despite being present in both the bodies of men and women.

Because these body parts are not gender- or -specific, Dr. Small wants their names updated to reflect all people and not just the male half of the population. The professor hopes that through her initiative, she will be able to transform the anatomical language used across the globe, starting in societies like Australia and the United States.

Dr. Kristin Small doesn’t just teach anatomy classes. She is also a specialist obstetrician from Queensland. As a female medical professional, she has an awareness of the terms floating around the medical community and believes it is time for an update. That’s why she is leading the charge by using her authority as a professor to teach her students something a bit different. Instead of using the names of “men, kings, and (male) gods” to describe human body parts, she thinks there are more anatomically correct solutions that can relate to every person on the globe.

“I think we have a personal choice to decolonize our language, and these historical terms will fade out,” Dr. Small told the Courier-Mail.

Related Posts

Senate Confronts Presidential War Powers in a Pivotal Vote After Maduro’s Ouster, Testing Constitutional Limits, Congressional Authority, and America’s Democratic Identity at a Moment of Global Uncertainty and Intensifying Executive Power

The dramatic U.S. military operation that resulted in the capture of Nicolás Maduro has unleashed a fierce constitutional debate in Washington that may have deeper implications at…

Melania Trump Breaks Silence with New Official White House Statement

Melania Trump’s New Official Portrait Sparks Debate Melania Trump’s new official White House portrait, released January 28, 2025, has drawn wide public interest and debate. Captured in…

Red Mayor’s First Shockwave

Zohran Mamdani didn’t inherit power; he arrived with urgency sharpened into purpose. He stood in front of battered Brooklyn walk-ups where tenants had endured years of eviction…

Woman killed by ICE agent in Minneapolis identified — what we know about her

Minneapolis is reeling after a fatal shooting involving a federal ICE agent that has sparked outrage across the country. The woman killed during the incident has been…

Trump dubbed a ‘disgrace to humanity’ after latest comment about ICE shooting victim Renee Nicole Good

The shooting of Renee Nicole Good has sent shockwaves across the United States. And new statements from President Trump have only intensified the situation. A fatal shooting…

The laughs never showed up — and that’s exactly why it landed so hard. Jimmy Kimmel walked out on stage, skipped the punchlines, and spoke plainly about the uncertain future of public media, leaving the room unusually quiet. There was no sarcasm, no smirk. Just a steady voice talking about voices being pushed out, access to real information slipping away, and what it means when truth starts feeling out of reach. The shift was immediate — viewers could feel it. This wasn’t a bit. It wasn’t satire. It was Jimmy, speaking as himself — and it felt uncomfortably real. By the next morning, the clip was everywhere. Some praised him for saying what others won’t. Critics accused him of turning late-night TV into something it shouldn’t be. But one thing was clear: he hit on something people have been avoiding. And the simple, almost offhand example he shared at the very end turned the moment from serious… into impossible to ignore.

The laughs never came—and that absence was the point. On a December broadcast of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Jimmy Kimmel stepped onto the stage of the El Capitan…